<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homeschooling Ruled Illegal in California&#8211;Seriously</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/</link>
	<description>A Good Christian Raisin' and a Eighth Grade Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:24:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jenni</title>
		<link>http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/06/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>I have written about this situation myself. It is good to see others who are taking this seriously as there are many who are not.

You can read my take on this matter here:

http://www.thefullquiverhomeschoolhouse.wordpress.com

Also, this info may be helpful:

California--Court against Home Schooling


LEGISLATIVE NEWSFLASH - March 7, 2008
From: Roy Hanson&#039;s Private and Home Educators of California

***** ***** ***** *****
As you probably know, on Thursday, February 28th, The Second Appellate 
District in Los Angeles County ruled that a homeschooling family from 
Southern California (not a member of HSLDA) did not have a right to 
&quot;homeschool&quot; under the California Constitution unless the parent is a 
credentialed tutor.
***** ***** ***** *****

Current Situation
Nothing has changed in California regarding your homeschool. HSLDA 
maintains that the advice they have given home school families for 
some twenty-five years is still accurate and that filing a private 
school affidavit, or enrolling in a private school independent study 
program (I.S.P) are valid options under the law in California.

In summary, homeschoolers should not panic but continue to home school 
as in the past. The leaders of the statewide homeschool groups and 
HSLDA are coordinating with each other on this issue on a regular 
basis. Pray for a positive outcome. The attorneys at HSLDA are 
working very hard during this time to prepare for additional legal 
action to reverse this decision. Seeking legislation at this time is 
unnecessary and likely dangerous.
***** ***** ***** *****

Governor&#039;s office press release Friday, March 7, 2008 
Gov. Schwarzenegger Issues Statement Regarding Court of Appeals Home 
Schooling Ruling
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger today issued the following statement 
regarding the recent Second District Court of Appeals ruling on home 
schooling:

&quot;Every California child deserves a quality education and parents 
should have the right to decide what&#039;s best for their children. 
Parents should not be penalized for acting in the best interests of 
their children&#039;s education. This outrageous ruling must be overturned 
by the courts and if the courts don&#039;t protect parents&#039; rights then, as 
elected officials, we will.&quot;
***** ***** ***** *****

Background
This ruling resulted from a Juvenile Court case on allegations of 
abuse or neglect, which originally had nothing to do with 
homeschooling. When the Juvenile Court judge would not prohibit the 
parents from home schooling their children, the court-appointed 
attorneys for the children went to the California Court of Appeals. 
The Appellate Court went further than they needed to, and essentially 
ruled that State law does not provide any options that allow parents 
to teach their own children at home.

Future court action on this Appellate Court ruling cannot occur until 
after March 29th. This ruling is a very serious matter but not a 
cause for panic. There are legal options still open to pursue in the 
Courts. HSLDA is working to overturn this decision in the courts. In 
other words, this Appellate Court ruling is not the final say.

It is important to realize that no laws have changed that affect 
private schools whether in one&#039;s home or on a campus. California is 
still one of twelve states where homeschoolers can operate legally 
under the private school provision. See our Legal Fact Sheet. The 
Court does not have the power to change the law but only to interpret 
it, and this court has made critical errors in their interpretation of 
private school laws as they apply to private home education.

No court has the authority to universally order every homeschooler 
into a public or private campus school. Under due process the court 
can only issue orders directed to the parties before the court. Any 
attempts of enforcement would have to be one family at a time. As in 
the past, a family could be charged with truancy and then go to a SARB 
hearing even before any court hearing. This should not be a dread for 
anyone who is a member of HSLDA. If you are not a member of HSLDA you 
should join now!

If a public official comes to your door and tells you that home 
schooling is illegal and that you must put your kids in a public 
school or a private campus school, do not let them in your house, call 
HSLDA if you are a member, and let the HSLDA attorney talk to the 
person at the door. HSLDA attorneys are available to their members 24 
hours a day seven days a week.

***** ***** ***** *****
What can homeschoolers do right now to help?
(1) This court&#039;s ruling could provoke well-meaning individuals to seek 
a legislative remedy. Legislation at this time would be detrimental 
to our current freedom to home school privately in California. If you 
become aware through first hand knowledge of any such attempt to have 
a legislator introduce legislation addressing or dealing with home 
schooling, please contact us at contat@pheofca.org immediately!

(2) Please encourage your home schooling friends to join HSLDA now for 
two reasons! (a) Membership in and contributions to HSLDA will help 
provide the financial resources needed to carry on this complex and 
lengthy court process for judicial relief from this current ruling. 
This will benefit all homeschoolers. (b) HSLDA membership will 
protect your family should you be contacted as a result of this 
Appellate Court ruling. This will also give you the piece of mind 
that, whenever you might need it, you have immediate support from the 
only experienced highly successful team of attorneys specialized in 
defending private home schoolers in California and our Nation.

(3) In all situations, it is the Lord Jesus Christ Who is our refuge, 
provider, and protector (Psalm 50:10-15). He is sovereign over all. 
Our Lord reigns! We are asking that you pray daily and also consider 
some kind of periodic fasting during this protracted battle that is 
shaping up. Pray for:
* those in authority, especially the judges involved in this case,
* the Long family involved in this case,
every fellow private homeschooling family
* HSLDA as they prepare to not only handle this situation but as they 
respond to all future legal contacts,
* for us here at Family Protection Ministries that God would sustain 
us and that we will be able to intercept every legislative proposal 
that could further erode our freedoms,
* CHEA and every other home school organization in California, and
* all other individuals and groups supporting this effort to defend 
home education.

(4) Continue on with a peaceful heart in your homeschooling and family 
life. 



***** ***** ***** *****
Permission is given to reprint this document or distribute it by email 
in its entirety without alteration. You are encouraged to link to 
this document on our website www.pheofca.org

***** ***** ***** *****
Roy Hanson&#039;s HELP Tree
Private and Home Educators of California
P.O. Box 730
Lincoln, CA 95648-0730
Fax: (916) 415-9470
contact@pheofca.org

***** ***** ***** *****
The purpose of this communication is to present information and 
express our position on the issues addressed. We encourage you to 
research this for yourself and come to your own conclusions. 
Regardless of your position, we strongly urge you to exercise your 
constitutional right to express your position to your elected 
representatives. We have included an example of how we have expressed 
our position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written about this situation myself. It is good to see others who are taking this seriously as there are many who are not.</p>
<p>You can read my take on this matter here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefullquiverhomeschoolhouse.wordpress.com" >http://www.thefullquiverhomeschoolhouse.wordpress.com</a></p>
<p>Also, this info may be helpful:</p>
<p>California&#8211;Court against Home Schooling</p>
<p>LEGISLATIVE NEWSFLASH &#8211; March 7, 2008<br />
From: Roy Hanson&#8217;s Private and Home Educators of California</p>
<p>***** ***** ***** *****<br />
As you probably know, on Thursday, February 28th, The Second Appellate<br />
District in Los Angeles County ruled that a homeschooling family from<br />
Southern California (not a member of HSLDA) did not have a right to<br />
&#8220;homeschool&#8221; under the California Constitution unless the parent is a<br />
credentialed tutor.<br />
***** ***** ***** *****</p>
<p>Current Situation<br />
Nothing has changed in California regarding your homeschool. HSLDA<br />
maintains that the advice they have given home school families for<br />
some twenty-five years is still accurate and that filing a private<br />
school affidavit, or enrolling in a private school independent study<br />
program (I.S.P) are valid options under the law in California.</p>
<p>In summary, homeschoolers should not panic but continue to home school<br />
as in the past. The leaders of the statewide homeschool groups and<br />
HSLDA are coordinating with each other on this issue on a regular<br />
basis. Pray for a positive outcome. The attorneys at HSLDA are<br />
working very hard during this time to prepare for additional legal<br />
action to reverse this decision. Seeking legislation at this time is<br />
unnecessary and likely dangerous.<br />
***** ***** ***** *****</p>
<p>Governor&#8217;s office press release Friday, March 7, 2008<br />
Gov. Schwarzenegger Issues Statement Regarding Court of Appeals Home<br />
Schooling Ruling<br />
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger today issued the following statement<br />
regarding the recent Second District Court of Appeals ruling on home<br />
schooling:</p>
<p>&#8220;Every California child deserves a quality education and parents<br />
should have the right to decide what&#8217;s best for their children.<br />
Parents should not be penalized for acting in the best interests of<br />
their children&#8217;s education. This outrageous ruling must be overturned<br />
by the courts and if the courts don&#8217;t protect parents&#8217; rights then, as<br />
elected officials, we will.&#8221;<br />
***** ***** ***** *****</p>
<p>Background<br />
This ruling resulted from a Juvenile Court case on allegations of<br />
abuse or neglect, which originally had nothing to do with<br />
homeschooling. When the Juvenile Court judge would not prohibit the<br />
parents from home schooling their children, the court-appointed<br />
attorneys for the children went to the California Court of Appeals.<br />
The Appellate Court went further than they needed to, and essentially<br />
ruled that State law does not provide any options that allow parents<br />
to teach their own children at home.</p>
<p>Future court action on this Appellate Court ruling cannot occur until<br />
after March 29th. This ruling is a very serious matter but not a<br />
cause for panic. There are legal options still open to pursue in the<br />
Courts. HSLDA is working to overturn this decision in the courts. In<br />
other words, this Appellate Court ruling is not the final say.</p>
<p>It is important to realize that no laws have changed that affect<br />
private schools whether in one&#8217;s home or on a campus. California is<br />
still one of twelve states where homeschoolers can operate legally<br />
under the private school provision. See our Legal Fact Sheet. The<br />
Court does not have the power to change the law but only to interpret<br />
it, and this court has made critical errors in their interpretation of<br />
private school laws as they apply to private home education.</p>
<p>No court has the authority to universally order every homeschooler<br />
into a public or private campus school. Under due process the court<br />
can only issue orders directed to the parties before the court. Any<br />
attempts of enforcement would have to be one family at a time. As in<br />
the past, a family could be charged with truancy and then go to a SARB<br />
hearing even before any court hearing. This should not be a dread for<br />
anyone who is a member of HSLDA. If you are not a member of HSLDA you<br />
should join now!</p>
<p>If a public official comes to your door and tells you that home<br />
schooling is illegal and that you must put your kids in a public<br />
school or a private campus school, do not let them in your house, call<br />
HSLDA if you are a member, and let the HSLDA attorney talk to the<br />
person at the door. HSLDA attorneys are available to their members 24<br />
hours a day seven days a week.</p>
<p>***** ***** ***** *****<br />
What can homeschoolers do right now to help?<br />
(1) This court&#8217;s ruling could provoke well-meaning individuals to seek<br />
a legislative remedy. Legislation at this time would be detrimental<br />
to our current freedom to home school privately in California. If you<br />
become aware through first hand knowledge of any such attempt to have<br />
a legislator introduce legislation addressing or dealing with home<br />
schooling, please contact us at <a href="mailto:contat@pheofca.org">contat@pheofca.org</a> immediately!</p>
<p>(2) Please encourage your home schooling friends to join HSLDA now for<br />
two reasons! (a) Membership in and contributions to HSLDA will help<br />
provide the financial resources needed to carry on this complex and<br />
lengthy court process for judicial relief from this current ruling.<br />
This will benefit all homeschoolers. (b) HSLDA membership will<br />
protect your family should you be contacted as a result of this<br />
Appellate Court ruling. This will also give you the piece of mind<br />
that, whenever you might need it, you have immediate support from the<br />
only experienced highly successful team of attorneys specialized in<br />
defending private home schoolers in California and our Nation.</p>
<p>(3) In all situations, it is the Lord Jesus Christ Who is our refuge,<br />
provider, and protector (Psalm 50:10-15). He is sovereign over all.<br />
Our Lord reigns! We are asking that you pray daily and also consider<br />
some kind of periodic fasting during this protracted battle that is<br />
shaping up. Pray for:<br />
* those in authority, especially the judges involved in this case,<br />
* the Long family involved in this case,<br />
every fellow private homeschooling family<br />
* HSLDA as they prepare to not only handle this situation but as they<br />
respond to all future legal contacts,<br />
* for us here at Family Protection Ministries that God would sustain<br />
us and that we will be able to intercept every legislative proposal<br />
that could further erode our freedoms,<br />
* CHEA and every other home school organization in California, and<br />
* all other individuals and groups supporting this effort to defend<br />
home education.</p>
<p>(4) Continue on with a peaceful heart in your homeschooling and family<br />
life. </p>
<p>***** ***** ***** *****<br />
Permission is given to reprint this document or distribute it by email<br />
in its entirety without alteration. You are encouraged to link to<br />
this document on our website <a href="http://www.pheofca.org" >http://www.pheofca.org</a></p>
<p>***** ***** ***** *****<br />
Roy Hanson&#8217;s HELP Tree<br />
Private and Home Educators of California<br />
P.O. Box 730<br />
Lincoln, CA 95648-0730<br />
Fax: (916) 415-9470<br />
<a href="mailto:contact@pheofca.org">contact@pheofca.org</a></p>
<p>***** ***** ***** *****<br />
The purpose of this communication is to present information and<br />
express our position on the issues addressed. We encourage you to<br />
research this for yourself and come to your own conclusions.<br />
Regardless of your position, we strongly urge you to exercise your<br />
constitutional right to express your position to your elected<br />
representatives. We have included an example of how we have expressed<br />
our position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/06/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/#comment-2192</guid>
		<description>&gt;â€œParents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children,â€
&gt;Excuse me? What about the 9th Amendment? And the Tenth?

Ummm, well according to most interpretations of those amendments among conservatives and libertarians it is quite correct to say that there is no constitutional right to homeschool. Those amendments leave it perfectly within &quot;states rights&quot; for the states to allow it or disallow it as they see fit. 

It is precisely the same argument that they use to say that &quot;states&#039; rights&quot; allow for abortion prohibition, anti-sodomy laws, discriminatory marriage statutes, etc.

Now I personally disagree with the idea that states rights are more important than individual rights, and think the &quot;libertarian&quot; fetish for constitutional anti-federalism is fairly warped -- but I am a distinct minority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;â€œParents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children,â€<br />
&gt;Excuse me? What about the 9th Amendment? And the Tenth?</p>
<p>Ummm, well according to most interpretations of those amendments among conservatives and libertarians it is quite correct to say that there is no constitutional right to homeschool. Those amendments leave it perfectly within &#8220;states rights&#8221; for the states to allow it or disallow it as they see fit. </p>
<p>It is precisely the same argument that they use to say that &#8220;states&#8217; rights&#8221; allow for abortion prohibition, anti-sodomy laws, discriminatory marriage statutes, etc.</p>
<p>Now I personally disagree with the idea that states rights are more important than individual rights, and think the &#8220;libertarian&#8221; fetish for constitutional anti-federalism is fairly warped &#8212; but I am a distinct minority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dolphin</title>
		<link>http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2191</link>
		<dc:creator>dolphin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/06/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/#comment-2191</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;That statement is self contradicting: â€œproper credentialsâ€ means possession of a â€œlicenseâ€ issued by the government. A license is â€œpermission to do that which is otherwise illegalâ€. From this it follows the â€œhome schoolingâ€ is illegal; QED.&lt;/i&gt;

bob r,

&quot;Homeschooling&quot; is not defined by whether or not one has a license or otherwise enrolls their children in secondary activities.  You can legally home school in California.  Period.

You&#039;re comment is nothing more than sophistry (bad sophistry at that).  By the illogic you have put forth in your comment, it&#039;s illegal to drive a car (among many, many, many other everyday activities).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That statement is self contradicting: â€œproper credentialsâ€ means possession of a â€œlicenseâ€ issued by the government. A license is â€œpermission to do that which is otherwise illegalâ€. From this it follows the â€œhome schoolingâ€ is illegal; QED.</i></p>
<p>bob r,</p>
<p>&#8220;Homeschooling&#8221; is not defined by whether or not one has a license or otherwise enrolls their children in secondary activities.  You can legally home school in California.  Period.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re comment is nothing more than sophistry (bad sophistry at that).  By the illogic you have put forth in your comment, it&#8217;s illegal to drive a car (among many, many, many other everyday activities).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sadcox</title>
		<link>http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2190</link>
		<dc:creator>sadcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/06/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/#comment-2190</guid>
		<description>DNA...

I hadn&#039;t even thought of this from the angle you are taking (I don&#039;t live in Cali.), but I think you&#039;re on to something here.  Yet another problem with allocating federal funds to school districts.

Then again, the Teacher&#039;s Unions just want what is best for the kids, right?  Just like the UAW is focused on making the highest quality, lowest cost vehicles they possibly can, in spite of the wishes of GM and Ford.

Sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DNA&#8230;</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t even thought of this from the angle you are taking (I don&#8217;t live in Cali.), but I think you&#8217;re on to something here.  Yet another problem with allocating federal funds to school districts.</p>
<p>Then again, the Teacher&#8217;s Unions just want what is best for the kids, right?  Just like the UAW is focused on making the highest quality, lowest cost vehicles they possibly can, in spite of the wishes of GM and Ford.</p>
<p>Sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dna</title>
		<link>http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2189</link>
		<dc:creator>dna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/06/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/#comment-2189</guid>
		<description>Is it only coincidence that this ruling comes at the same time that state budget cuts are affecting School Districts so immensely? San Diego Unified is facing cuts of around 15-20%, teachers and staff are being layed off in the upcoming year, and there are clear efforts to try to increase enrollment. Why do they need to increase enrollment by enrolling homeschooled kids who (in some studies) are shown to actually test higher on standardized exams then publicly scholled kids? Makes me wonder what part the Teacher&#039;s Union does play in this, and what the motives are behind it all. Is it just purely to keep m,oney flowing into the schools?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it only coincidence that this ruling comes at the same time that state budget cuts are affecting School Districts so immensely? San Diego Unified is facing cuts of around 15-20%, teachers and staff are being layed off in the upcoming year, and there are clear efforts to try to increase enrollment. Why do they need to increase enrollment by enrolling homeschooled kids who (in some studies) are shown to actually test higher on standardized exams then publicly scholled kids? Makes me wonder what part the Teacher&#8217;s Union does play in this, and what the motives are behind it all. Is it just purely to keep m,oney flowing into the schools?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob r</title>
		<link>http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2188</link>
		<dc:creator>bob r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/06/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/#comment-2188</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Itâ€™s illegal for â€œparents to fail to comply with school enrollment lawsâ€ no doubt, but according to the article, homeschooling is not inherently against school enrollment laws, so long as the home-schooling parent has proper credentials.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

That statement is self contradicting: &quot;proper credentials&quot; means possession of a &quot;license&quot; issued by the government.  A license is &quot;permission to do that which is otherwise illegal&quot;.  From this it follows the &quot;home schooling&quot; is illegal; QED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Itâ€™s illegal for â€œparents to fail to comply with school enrollment lawsâ€ no doubt, but according to the article, homeschooling is not inherently against school enrollment laws, so long as the home-schooling parent has proper credentials.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>That statement is self contradicting: &#8220;proper credentials&#8221; means possession of a &#8220;license&#8221; issued by the government.  A license is &#8220;permission to do that which is otherwise illegal&#8221;.  From this it follows the &#8220;home schooling&#8221; is illegal; QED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; Too far</title>
		<link>http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2187</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; Too far</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/06/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/#comment-2187</guid>
		<description>[...] First, they came for the homeschoolers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, they came for the homeschoolers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2184</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/06/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/#comment-2184</guid>
		<description>Wanted to let you know that I subscribed - I appreciate you NOT taking a religious stance on this. That is not what this is about. It is for PARENTAL RIGHTS.

Always pain free hugs,
Christine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wanted to let you know that I subscribed &#8211; I appreciate you NOT taking a religious stance on this. That is not what this is about. It is for PARENTAL RIGHTS.</p>
<p>Always pain free hugs,<br />
Christine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2183</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/06/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/#comment-2183</guid>
		<description>I homeschool for NON-Religious reasons. (Sorry it&#039;s long - my blog is longer) Recently posted in my blog: I want to give my opinion into this matter: It should be PARENTS CHOICE, NOT THE GOVERNMENTS CHOICE. Parental rights?? Anyone heard of them? Are we being stripped of them more and more?? Why?

It just so happens that the people hurting my child were not other students, it happened to be faculty members at Cubberley Elementary, in San Diego, CA (the Serra Mesa area). The faculty needs to be removed and replaced with faculty that can handle children and aren&#039;t allowed to stay there because they have tenure. GET RID OF THEM. With regards to the abuse, I have letters, received parents first hand accounts, and even the red haired secretary in the front office stated to my mom, &quot;Sorry for being mean to (your son), we didn&#039;t know how to deal with him.&quot; Because of them, my then 8 year old was going to need depression medicine, was calling himself stupid, and hitting himself.

I removed him immediately. I chose to homeschool him. Because of homeschooling, my sons self esteem is at the highest level. He understands the importance of family. I even have him do chores without difficulties (at least most of the time LOL). I have been able to teach him household chores without trying to also finish at least 3 hours of homework, and that was after he spent 6 hours in school. ?? Why?? Did you know that studies have been done showing that more time is spent getting classes in order then in actual teaching??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I homeschool for NON-Religious reasons. (Sorry it&#8217;s long &#8211; my blog is longer) Recently posted in my blog: I want to give my opinion into this matter: It should be PARENTS CHOICE, NOT THE GOVERNMENTS CHOICE. Parental rights?? Anyone heard of them? Are we being stripped of them more and more?? Why?</p>
<p>It just so happens that the people hurting my child were not other students, it happened to be faculty members at Cubberley Elementary, in San Diego, CA (the Serra Mesa area). The faculty needs to be removed and replaced with faculty that can handle children and aren&#8217;t allowed to stay there because they have tenure. GET RID OF THEM. With regards to the abuse, I have letters, received parents first hand accounts, and even the red haired secretary in the front office stated to my mom, &#8220;Sorry for being mean to (your son), we didn&#8217;t know how to deal with him.&#8221; Because of them, my then 8 year old was going to need depression medicine, was calling himself stupid, and hitting himself.</p>
<p>I removed him immediately. I chose to homeschool him. Because of homeschooling, my sons self esteem is at the highest level. He understands the importance of family. I even have him do chores without difficulties (at least most of the time LOL). I have been able to teach him household chores without trying to also finish at least 3 hours of homework, and that was after he spent 6 hours in school. ?? Why?? Did you know that studies have been done showing that more time is spent getting classes in order then in actual teaching??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-2181</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itfrom.us/2008/03/06/homeschooling-ruled-illegal-in-california-seriously/#comment-2181</guid>
		<description>This is outrageous. 

â€œParents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children,â€ 

Excuse me? What about the 9th Amendment? And the Tenth? 

We have ALL the rights except those specifically mentioned in the constitution as belonging to government. 

The ninth: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The tenth: 	The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

This is really screwed up thinking. And so scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is outrageous. </p>
<p>â€œParents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children,â€ </p>
<p>Excuse me? What about the 9th Amendment? And the Tenth? </p>
<p>We have ALL the rights except those specifically mentioned in the constitution as belonging to government. </p>
<p>The ninth: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.</p>
<p>The tenth: 	The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.</p>
<p>This is really screwed up thinking. And so scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
