On The Demise of Volunteer Voters

I continue to be amazed by big media’s short sighted decisions.

This week, Nashville’s WKRN pulled the plug on one of the blogosphere’s dishes I devour daily–Volunteer Voters. This decision was apparently part of budget cuts, which I assume means that the dollars spent on VV were greater than the dollars it generated.

What does it say about the state of news when a regional media outlet can’t afford to be among the leaders for regional political discussion? Does WKRN think this void won’t be filled by someone else? Is that something they can afford?

Here’s a sound business strategy:

  1. Eliminate the things that set you apart.
  2. Make sure you do exactly what your competition is doing–nothing more, nothing less.
  3. No matter what it costs long term, strive every day to be…ordinary.

ACK, hope you’ll continue to be active elsewhere in the future.

Similar Posts:

del.icio.us:On The Demise of Volunteer Voters  digg:On The Demise of Volunteer Voters  spurl:On The Demise of Volunteer Voters  newsvine:On The Demise of Volunteer Voters  furl:On The Demise of Volunteer Voters  reddit:On The Demise of Volunteer Voters Tags: , , , , ,

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

[…] still more thoughts on the end of Volunteer Voters from Hear ItFrom.Us: What does it say about the state of news when a regional media outlet can’t afford to be among […]

Great Post, Sadcox.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.